Breaking News

February Exam. I decided not to waste any time on performance tests other than to listen to the lectures again. I say reluctantly because I wholeheartedly think the Barbri questions are just a little off. And for me, that confused me. Barbri never talks about how the questions are phrased. I like learning this kind of stuff — sort of like figuring out the backstory of how a question is crafted to figure out how to get to the answer they want. The book also has only real MBE questions. Oh, and on the test date, some of those questions seemed frightfully similar to the ones in the book.

Something I found helpful was writing out by hand the statements of law for the correct answer choices when I got a question wrong. I also wrote out the correct statements of law for wrong answer choices that I had picked. There were definitely areas I was consistently getting wrong: search and seizure, defamation, first amendment. By the end I felt more comfortable with these hotspot areas.


  • Tips for the California Bar Exam (Attorney Exam - Essays Only) - Top Law Schools!
  • California Bar Exam Tip: Essay Predictions – Bar Exam Guru's Blog.
  • Search form.
  • Uncategorized!

I know memorization was an issue for me so I liked that this was set up just to be drills. Do not have a filter. I worked full time while studying for the Bar in February.

State by State Guide to the Bar Exam

I didn't take any time off. Sometimes I had to do work in the evenings which meant I didn't even have time to study many nights. And yet I still passed. While I think it helped that I had studied the material once before, I think what was more important was my focus. Whenever I studied, I tried my best to be totally present. All in all, I spent less hours studying the second time around, but they were better hours.

Also, what I found was that folks were eager to help me however possible. My roommate often hung out with friends outside of the apartment to give me some studying space. My boyfriend came up to Alaska to take care of me for the last two weeks — mainly helping with laundry and meals and other chores while I crammed. Lots of people gave me advice the first time around as to how to study. I tried to listen, tried it out, and didn't really find a groove. I just never felt in control of my studying. I think had I been more aggressive in my studying, I would have figured out some system to get the stuff into my head better and have that command over my time, energy, and brain space.

Wisdom for the California Bar Exam

But I didn't give myself that opportunity, and it was hard for me to acknowledge that. No way around it. Most folks figure that out the first week of studying, but it took me a bit longer. This Happened to Me.

Sign in. Get started. Reflections from my experience taking the California bar exam…twice. Kimi Narita Follow. This Happened to Me Life is made of stories. This Happened to Me Follow. Life is made of stories. Write the first response. Discover Medium. Make Medium yours.

test.trailblazer.outdoorsy.co

Testimonials - The Strategic Bar Coach

Become a member. No way you say? The audience is trying to figure you out. The Bullet Catch is a classic magic trick. Magic — right? Actually, neither. The National Conference of Bar Examiners spends considerable time and treasure creating MBE questions, creating layer upon layer of question creation, editing, review, pretesting, and statistical tracking to make sure that questions go out on stage every bit as slick and apparently impenetrable as the Double Bullet Catch.

Okay — take a breath. Open your mind to this possibility. If you can learn to spot these tricks, or even just the most common ones, and then practice, practice, practice, what may seem like insurmountable wizardry at the moment can, over time, turn into just another day at the office.

Please stay tuned! You can know IRAC. You can know how to write. This type of question is easier than other types in the sense that each cause of action and its defenses can be discussed separately. Developer did not breach the contract with Builder. Four previous blog entries have outlined steps to create an instinctively good impression of your essay answer on the part of the grader.

Step Three is to write the applicable rules of law completely and precisely, whenever possible stating the rule verbatim. Each method requires more of you than the last: the ability to structure your answer: the ability to identify the legal issues, the ability to articulate clearly the applicable rules of law. Creating a positive instinctive reaction on the part of your grader requires not only that you have these abilities but that you expertly depict them on the page.

Take a side! Persuasiveness requires you to express unequivocal judgments about the facts. Being persuasive requires you to:. D will counter-argue. Transitional words and phrases implicitly or explicitly summarize information that you have already presented and help the grader anticipate what you are about to say. Make your sentences factually dense. Your grader knows thoroughly the contents of the question you are answering.

There is no need to quote the question. However, Builder will argue that in pre contract negotiations when Developer told him he would not be able to proceed with the contract he affirmed this statement by acknowledging that he understood such a condition to be implicit in section 14 d. Here, the agreement between Developer and Builder has been reduced to writing.

In this case, the contract provides for the construction of 10 single family homes and has several sections … describing aspects of the venture. Importantly, the writing contains a merger clause …Courts typically find that the parol evidence bar to extrinsic evidence presumptively applies where the writing contains a merger clause. Accordingly, a court will likely find that the parol evidence rule applies.

This Happened to Me

Answer 1 is not persuasive. It equivocates. It conveys very little information that is useful in making a grading decision. It portrays the applicant who wrote it in a bad light. What do you think of the answer? Answer 2 is powerful and persuasive. The applicant then recites those facts succinctly. Part 2 may have persuaded you to exploit that reaction by constructing your topic headings to respond directly to the call of the question.

Composing forceful sub-headings tests your legal knowledge and analytical ability. You must be sufficiently grounded in the subject matter to identify the legal issues that each sub-call raises.